Paperless Philosophy as a Philosophical Method
نویسنده
چکیده
I discuss the prospects for new forms of professional communication in philosophy. I argue that online discussions and online surveys ought to play a more important role in communications between philosophers than they play today. However, there are major obstacles to the widespread adoption of these media as channels of communication between academics. I offer an overview of these obstacles and sketch a strategy for surmounting them. The strategy I propose involves the development of a new kind of service which could expand the reach of the analytic method in philosophy. A philosopher’s work centers on the production, delivery, and consumption of books and articles. New communication technologies have enabled faster, more convenient means of contributing to and drawing from the philosophical corpus, but there has been no major shift in the format of research communications since the foundation of the Royal Society in the 17th Century. Philosophers still communicate their research mostly through books and articles, whether in print or delivered verbally through talks and lectures. In this paper, I discuss the prospects for new forms of professional communication in philosophy. I am particularly interested in the future of online discussion spaces and online surveys; I believe that these types of service ought to play a more important role in communications between philosophers than they play today. I will explain what potential I see in these services and offer a tentative diagnosis of why their potential remains largely unrealized. Having identified some problems with current discussion spaces and survey services, I will sketch a new kind of online service which integrates discussion spaces and surveys in a way which could help overcome their individual shortcomings. The service I propose could expand the reach of the analytic method in philosophy. 1 Online discussion spaces: potential and reality By “online discussion spaces”, I mean all online spaces which enable participants to pursue public (or semi-public) conversations with groups of individuals asynchronously. This definition encompasses many different kinds of online service, including discussion forums, weblogs, and the kinds of messaging spaces found on social networking services.
منابع مشابه
The Rrelationship between Philosophy and Medicine in The Works of Imam Fakhr Razi: A Distinct Model from Galen and Avicenna
The long-standing interaction of philosophy and medicine has assumed to be as follows: great physicians have been also philosophers, so there is a relationship between medicine and philosophy. In this paper, based on philosophical modeling, essentials of interaction for medicine and philosophy are presented. First, brief descriptions of two models of medicine-philosophy interaction are presente...
متن کاملFrom Temporality to Eternity: Three Philosophical Approaches
This article studies the problem of eternal life from a philosophical perspective. It focuses on the approaches of Bergson, Husserl, and Heidegger from contemporary philosophy, and shows that using these three philosophical approaches can better explain certain aspects of revealed theology, such as resurrection of flesh, eternity in a transcendent dimension, and eternal life as the angels in he...
متن کاملThe Nature of Comparative Research in Philosophy of Education: Faaraabee\'s Method
The Nature of Comparative Research in Philosophy of Education: Faaraabee's Method M.H. Mirzaamohammadi, Ph.D. Comparative research, from a philosophical perspective in education, goes beyond the mere comparison of two ideas or subjects, and necessitates both judgment and critical analysis. Considering the complexities of the educational processes, doing comparative research in educati...
متن کاملدر آمدی بر فلسفۀ زیست شناسی
The growth of philosophical interest in biology over the past thirty years reflects the increasing prominence of the biological sciences in the same period. There is now an extensive literature on many different biological topics, and it would be impossible to summarise this body of work in this single entry. Instead, this entry sets out to explain what philosophy of biology is. Why does biolog...
متن کاملThat Philosophy as Epistemological-Based is Not Debased: A Critique of Post-Modernist/Hermeneutic Critique of Traditional Philosophy
Over the centuries, beginning with the classic Greeks through the trends of the mid-20th century, philosophical enterprise has been intricately and seemingly irretrievably rooted in the theory of the given—an edification of philosophy as that giant mirror and standard for measuring what counts as knowledge; but is it thus synonymous with or reducible to epistemology? How or why? There are two a...
متن کامل